APPLES TO APPLES? DISCORDANT DEFINITIONS STILL HINDER EVIDENCE-BASED TREATMENTS FOR SARCOPENIA
2024
Conflicting Definitions of Sarcopenia
publication
Author Information
Author(s): Coletta Giulia
Primary Institution: McMaster University
Hypothesis
The evolving definitions of sarcopenia hinder accurate diagnosis and treatment.
Conclusion
Different definitions of sarcopenia lead to varying prevalence rates and modest agreement among consensus groups.
Supporting Evidence
- Different consensus groups recommend various measures and cutoff points for diagnosing sarcopenia.
- The European Working Group and the Asian Working Group have different criteria for muscle mass, strength, and function.
Takeaway
Sarcopenia is a condition related to muscle loss, but different experts define it in different ways, making it hard to agree on how to diagnose it.
Limitations
The lack of criterion standards leads to differences in prevalence and agreement on definitions.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website