Study of GPs' Use of Electronic Patient Records
Author Information
Author(s): Tom Christensen, Anders Grimsmo
Primary Institution: Norwegian EHR Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Hypothesis
What are the benefits and effects of electronic patient records (EPR) from the perspective of GPs and patients?
Conclusion
GPs are generally satisfied with their EPR systems, but there are still unmet needs and functionality to be covered.
Supporting Evidence
- 95% of Norwegian GPs have adopted EPR systems.
- GPs reported that EPRs save time compared to paper records.
- Many GPs find it difficult to access relevant information in EPRs.
Takeaway
Doctors use computers to keep track of patient information, but sometimes it's hard to find what they need quickly.
Methodology
A combined qualitative and quantitative study using focus groups, observations, and a questionnaire survey of GPs.
Potential Biases
Potential biases due to the authors' backgrounds as GPs.
Limitations
The study may not represent all GPs as the selection was not randomized.
Participant Demographics
Participants included 23 GPs from 20 different medical practices.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website