Identifying Intimate Partner Violence in Chinese Women
Author Information
Author(s): Tiwari A, Fong DYT, Chan KL, Leung WC, Parker B, Ho PC
Primary Institution: The University of Hong Kong
Hypothesis
To assess the measurement accuracy and the utility of the Chinese Abuse Assessment Screen (AAS).
Conclusion
The Chinese AAS has demonstrated satisfactory measurement accuracy and utility for identifying intimate partner violence (IPV) when the Chinese CTS2 was used as the standard.
Supporting Evidence
- The specificity estimates of the Chinese AAS for emotional, physical, and sexual abuse were ≥89%.
- The sensitivity estimates varied from 36.3 to 65.8%, improving for more severe cases.
- Positive predictive values were ≥80%, indicating a high percentage of true positives.
- Negative predictive values varied from 66 to 93%, showing mixed results for different types of abuse.
- Factors such as age difference between couples and financial assistance needs were associated with IPV.
Takeaway
This study looked at how well a screening tool works to find out if Chinese women are experiencing partner violence. It found that the tool is pretty good at identifying those who are being abused.
Methodology
A cross-sectional study where the Chinese AAS was administered first, followed by the Chinese Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2) in the same sitting.
Potential Biases
Potential bias in self-reporting due to cultural norms around disclosing family issues.
Limitations
The sensitivity estimates were lower, especially for sexual abuse, indicating that some cases of IPV may be missed.
Participant Demographics
The sample consisted of 257 Chinese women, including 100 pregnant women and 157 nonpregnant women, primarily married with a mean age of 36.2 years.
Statistical Information
Confidence Interval
95% CI 83.6–95.8
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website