Valuing Different Types of Academic Scholarship in Health Sciences
Author Information
Author(s): Hofmeyer Anne, Newton Mandi, Scott Cathie
Primary Institution: University of Alberta
Hypothesis
How can health science scholars effectively report and evaluate the scholarship of integration and application?
Conclusion
The study emphasizes the need for academic institutions to recognize and reward diverse forms of scholarship beyond traditional research metrics.
Supporting Evidence
- The article highlights the need for a broader definition of scholarship in health sciences.
- It discusses the historical context of scholarship evaluation and its implications for faculty.
- The authors propose a participative framework for institutional change.
Takeaway
This article talks about how schools should value different types of work that help people, not just research papers. It suggests ways to make sure all kinds of academic work are appreciated.
Methodology
The article discusses frameworks and recommendations for evaluating the scholarship of integration and application in health sciences.
Limitations
The article does not provide empirical data to support its claims.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website