The landscape of recurrent spontaneous abortion registered on clinical trials.gov
2024

Overview of Clinical Trials for Recurrent Spontaneous Abortion

Sample size: 138 publication Evidence: low

Author Information

Author(s): Zhou Xiaoling, Lai Fan, Chen Wei, Zhou Congrong, Deng Yi, Wang Tao, Xing Shasha, Diao Haoyang, Tang Mi, Guo Wenmei, Luo Erdan

Primary Institution: Chengdu Women’s and Children’s Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China

Hypothesis

What are the characteristics of clinical trials related to recurrent spontaneous abortion registered on Clinical Trials.gov?

Conclusion

The study found that existing research efforts on recurrent spontaneous abortion are inadequate for developing effective prevention and treatment strategies.

Supporting Evidence

  • 138 clinical trials related to recurrent spontaneous abortion were identified.
  • 72 trials were classified as intervention trials and 66 as observational trials.
  • Approximately half of the studies had an enrollment of 100 participants or fewer.
  • Asia hosted the highest number of clinical trials, followed by Europe and Africa.
  • 61 trials focused on individuals with unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion.

Takeaway

This study looked at many trials about women who have repeated miscarriages to see what treatments are being tested. It found that most trials focus on drug treatments but there aren't enough good studies to help these women.

Methodology

A search was conducted on Clinical Trials.gov to identify trials related to recurrent spontaneous abortion, and 138 trials were analyzed.

Potential Biases

Some trials may have omitted important details during registration.

Limitations

The study only included trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, potentially missing others registered in different databases.

Participant Demographics

The majority of trials included only female participants, with a focus on those experiencing unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.3389/fendo.2024.1460968

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication