Cost-effectiveness of a workplace intervention for sick-listed employees with common mental disorders
Author Information
Author(s): van Oostrom Sandra H, Anema Johannes R, Terluin Berend, de Vet Henrica CW, Knol Dirk L, van Mechelen Willem
Primary Institution: VU University Medical Center
Hypothesis
Is the workplace intervention more cost-effective than usual care for sick-listed employees with common mental disorders?
Conclusion
The study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a workplace intervention designed to facilitate the return-to-work of employees with common mental disorders.
Supporting Evidence
- Common mental disorders are a significant cause of work absenteeism.
- The intervention is based on a successful return-to-work program for low back pain.
- Participants will be followed for one year to assess the effectiveness of the intervention.
- The study aims to improve disability management for employees with mental disorders.
Takeaway
This study is looking at a new way to help people with mental health issues get back to work faster and more effectively.
Methodology
The study is designed as a randomized controlled trial with a one-year follow-up, comparing a workplace intervention to usual care.
Potential Biases
Self-selection bias may occur due to the voluntary nature of participation.
Limitations
The study cannot blind participants or healthcare providers to the intervention allocation, which may introduce bias.
Participant Demographics
Participants are blue and white collar employees aged 18 to 65 on sick leave for 2 to 8 weeks due to common mental disorders.
Statistical Information
P-Value
0.05
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website