AQUILA: Quality Assessment in Lower Limb Arthroplasty
Author Information
Author(s): Pijls Bart G, Dekkers Olaf M, Middeldorp Saskia, Valstar Edward R, van der Heide Huub JL, Van der Linden-Van der Zwaag Henrica MJ, Nelissen Rob GHH
Primary Institution: Leiden University Medical Center
Hypothesis
Can a Delphi approach be used to develop a checklist for assessing the quality of case series and cohorts in total hip and knee arthroplasty?
Conclusion
The AQUILA checklist for reporting quality, methodological quality, and generalizability in total hip and knee arthroplasty was successfully created.
Supporting Evidence
- The Delphi method allowed for anonymous expert feedback to refine the checklist.
- Consensus was reached on an 8-item reporting quality checklist and a 6-item methodological checklist.
- The checklist aims to improve the quality of case series and cohorts in total hip and knee arthroplasty.
Takeaway
Experts worked together to create a checklist that helps doctors report on hip and knee surgeries better, making sure they include all important details.
Methodology
A web-based Delphi method was used, consisting of two internal rounds and three external rounds to reach expert consensus.
Potential Biases
Potential non-responder bias could affect the results, as those who participated may differ from those who did not.
Limitations
The preference for some checklist items was only moderate or low, and there may be non-responder bias.
Participant Demographics
The expert panel included 37 participants with a mean experience of 16 years, covering various nationalities and professional backgrounds.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website