Effectiveness of Two Desensitizing Agents for Tooth Sensitivity
Author Information
Author(s): Muacevic Alexander, Adler John R, Narra Mounika, Anumula Lavanya, Chinni Suneel Kumar, Govula Kiranmayi, Sannapureddy Swapna, Nagella Karthik
Primary Institution: Narayana Dental College and Hospital
Hypothesis
There is no significant difference between SDI Riva Star and Gluma Desensitizer in terms of their ability to occlude dentinal tubules and maintain occlusion over time.
Conclusion
Both SDI Riva Star and Gluma Desensitizer were effective in occluding dentinal tubules, but SDI Riva Star showed greater durability over time.
Supporting Evidence
- Both desensitizing agents occluded dentinal tubules effectively immediately after application.
- SDI Riva Star demonstrated superior durability after 30 days of brushing compared to Gluma Desensitizer.
- The study used scanning electron microscopy to assess tubule occlusion.
- Both agents were tested on freshly extracted human teeth.
Takeaway
This study tested two treatments for sensitive teeth and found that both worked well at first, but one lasted longer than the other after brushing.
Methodology
Fifty maxillary premolar specimens were treated with two desensitizing agents and assessed for tubule occlusion using scanning electron microscopy after application and after one month of brushing.
Limitations
The study was conducted in vitro, which may not fully replicate the complexities of the oral environment.
Participant Demographics
Freshly extracted, non-carious human maxillary first premolar teeth.
Statistical Information
P-Value
<0.01
Statistical Significance
p<0.01
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website