Human Impact on Amphibian Pathogens
Author Information
Author(s): St-Amour Valerie, Wong Wai M., Garner Trenton W.J., Lesbarrères David
Primary Institution: Laurentian University
Hypothesis
How do human activities influence the prevalence of amphibian pathogens?
Conclusion
Human activities significantly affect the prevalence of ranavirus in amphibians, while no significant relationship was found for chytrid infection.
Supporting Evidence
- Eight ponds showed ranavirus infection with prevalence ranging from 0% to 63%.
- Six ponds had frogs infected with chytrid fungus with prevalence ranging from 0% to 36%.
- Distance to industrial activity and human habitation significantly influenced ranavirus prevalence.
Takeaway
This study found that where people live and work can change how sick frogs get from certain diseases.
Methodology
The study involved sampling frogs from various ponds and testing them for two pathogens using molecular diagnostics.
Potential Biases
Potential biases may arise from the sampling strategy and the environmental conditions of the study sites.
Limitations
The study's findings are based on correlations and may not establish direct causation.
Participant Demographics
Frogs from 11 populations in central and northeastern Ontario, Canada.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p<0.01
Statistical Significance
p<0.01
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website