Nutrition attitudes and knowledge in medical students after completion of an integrated nutrition curriculum compared to a dedicated nutrition curriculum: a quasi-experimental study
2011

Nutrition Education in Medical Students

Sample size: 266 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Carolyn O. Walsh, Sonja I. Ziniel, Helen K. Delichatsios, David S. Ludwig

Primary Institution: Harvard Medical School

Hypothesis

Students in an integrated curriculum would be less satisfied with their nutrition education than those in a dedicated curriculum.

Conclusion

Medical student attitudes and knowledge about nutrition were not affected by the model of nutrition education they receive, though students in an integrated curriculum may feel their education is inadequate and seek additional training.

Supporting Evidence

  • Students with the integrated curriculum were less satisfied with both the quantity and quality of their nutrition education.
  • There were no differences in attitude or knowledge scores between the two groups.
  • ICN students were more likely to have completed optional online nutrition training modules.

Takeaway

This study looked at how different types of nutrition classes affect medical students. It found that students didn't learn differently, but those in the new style of class felt they needed more help.

Methodology

A quasi-experimental survey was administered to two groups of medical students, comparing their attitudes and knowledge about nutrition after completing different curricula.

Potential Biases

Non-randomized design may introduce bias; potential confounding events during the survey period.

Limitations

Moderate participation rate may indicate selection bias; results may not generalize to other medical schools.

Participant Demographics

Participants were second-year medical students at Harvard Medical School, with no significant demographic differences between groups.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.43

Statistical Significance

p<0.0001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1472-6920-11-58

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication