Blood Magnesium, and the Interaction with Calcium, on the Risk of High-Grade Prostate Cancer
2011

Blood Magnesium and Calcium Levels and Prostate Cancer Risk

Sample size: 494 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Dai Qi, Motley Saundra S., Smith Joseph A. Jr., Concepcion Raoul, Barocas Daniel, Byerly Susan, Fowke Jay H.

Primary Institution: Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Hypothesis

Inadequate magnesium levels, perhaps relative to calcium levels, are associated with greater prostate cancer risk.

Conclusion

Low blood magnesium levels and a high calcium-to-magnesium ratio were significantly associated with high-grade prostate cancer.

Supporting Evidence

  • Serum magnesium levels were significantly lower among high-grade prostate cancer cases compared to controls.
  • The calcium-to-magnesium ratio was significantly higher among high-grade cases.
  • Elevated magnesium was associated with a lower risk of high-grade prostate cancer.
  • Calcium levels were not significantly associated with prostate cancer or PIN.

Takeaway

This study found that having low magnesium in your blood and a high ratio of calcium to magnesium can increase the risk of serious prostate cancer.

Methodology

The study analyzed blood samples from participants in the Nashville Men's Health Study, using linear and logistic regression to assess associations between blood calcium, magnesium, and the calcium-to-magnesium ratio with prostate cancer risk.

Potential Biases

Potential detection biases related to differences in PSA levels and prostate volume were considered.

Limitations

The study cannot conclusively determine the temporal relationship between magnesium and calcium levels and prostate cancer development.

Participant Demographics

Participants were men aged 40 and older, with a mix of high-grade and low-grade prostate cancer cases, as well as controls.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.04

Confidence Interval

(0.09, 0.85)

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0018237

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication