Interference Screw vs. Suture Anchor Fixation for Biceps Tenodesis
Author Information
Author(s): Peter J Millett, Brett Sanders, Reuben Gobezie, Sepp Braun, Jon JP Warner
Primary Institution: Steadman Hawkins Clinic & Steadman Hawkins Research Foundation
Hypothesis
We hypothesize that subpectoral interference screw fixation offers relevant clinical advantages over suture anchor fixation for biceps tenodesis.
Conclusion
Subpectoral biceps tenodesis reliably relieves pain and improves function, with no statistically significant difference in outcomes between the two fixation techniques.
Supporting Evidence
- There were no failures of fixation in this study.
- All patients showed significant improvement in pain and function postoperatively.
- No significant differences were found between the two fixation techniques in terms of outcomes.
Takeaway
This study looked at two ways to fix a tendon in the shoulder and found that both worked well to reduce pain and improve movement.
Methodology
A retrospective review of 88 patients receiving open subpectoral biceps tenodesis with either interference screw fixation or suture anchor fixation.
Potential Biases
There may be bias due to the retrospective nature of the study and the coexistence of other pathologies.
Limitations
The study is retrospective and may have confounding variables that could influence the findings.
Participant Demographics
The cohort consisted of 31 females and 57 males with a mean age of 51 (range 22 to 77).
Statistical Information
P-Value
p = 0.2
Confidence Interval
[1.55, 1.97]
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website