Irinotecan plus leucovorin-modulated 5-fluorouracil I.V. bolus every other week may be a suitable therapeutic option also for elderly patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma
2003

Irinotecan and Leucovorin-Modified 5-Fluorouracil for Elderly Colorectal Cancer Patients

Sample size: 118 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Comella P, Farris A, Lorusso V, Palmeri S, Maiorino L, Lucia L De, Buzzi F, Mancarella S, Vita F De, Gambardella A

Primary Institution: National Tumour Institute, Naples, Italy

Hypothesis

Can irinotecan plus leucovorin-modulated 5-fluorouracil be a suitable treatment for elderly patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma?

Conclusion

The study suggests that irinotecan plus leucovorin-modulated 5-fluorouracil is a feasible treatment option for elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Supporting Evidence

  • The IRIFAFU regimen produced an overall response rate of 36%.
  • Median progression-free survival was 7.4 months for younger, 8.0 months for middle-aged, and 5.3 months for elderly patients.
  • Severe toxicity was not greater in elderly patients compared to younger patients.

Takeaway

Doctors found that a special combination of medicines can help older people with a type of cancer called colorectal cancer, and it seems to work well for them.

Methodology

Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were randomly assigned to receive the IRIFAFU regimen, and their responses and side effects were analyzed based on age groups.

Potential Biases

Potential selection bias due to reluctance of caregivers to refer elderly patients for treatment.

Limitations

The study was retrospective and not powered to reveal significant differences according to age, and there was a lack of data on associated diseases.

Participant Demographics

Patients were divided into three age groups: younger (≤54 years), middle-aged (55–69 years), and elderly (≥70 years).

Statistical Information

Confidence Interval

95% confidence interval, 28–44%

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1038/sj.bjc.6601214

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication