Genetic Variation on 9p22 Is Associated with Abnormal Ovarian Ultrasound Results in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial
2011

Genetic Variation on 9p22 and Ovarian Ultrasound Results

Sample size: 1106 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Wentzensen Nicolas, Black Amanda, Jacobs Kevin, Yang Hannah P., Berg Christine D., Caporaso Neil, Peters Ulrike, Ragard Lawrence, Buys Saundra S., Chanock Stephen, Hartge Patricia

Primary Institution: National Cancer Institute

Hypothesis

Are 9p22 SNPs associated with abnormal ovarian ultrasound results in women without ovarian cancer?

Conclusion

The study found that certain 9p22 SNPs are associated with abnormal ovarian ultrasound results, suggesting a complex relationship between these genetic variations and ovarian biology.

Supporting Evidence

  • 96 of the 1106 women had abnormal TVU results at any screening visit.
  • Seven SNPs showed significant odds ratios for abnormal TVU results at the first screen.
  • Women with minor alleles had fewer cysts compared to those with major alleles.

Takeaway

Some genes that might help protect against ovarian cancer are also linked to abnormal ultrasound results in women, which is a bit confusing.

Methodology

The study analyzed the association of 9p22 SNPs with transvaginal ultrasound results and CA-125 blood levels in women from the PLCO trial.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to the low positive predictive value of TVU screening and the limited demographic diversity of the sample.

Limitations

The study's findings require independent confirmation and the data on histology reports of benign outcomes were not systematically collected.

Participant Demographics

The study included 1,106 women, primarily Caucasian, with a mean age range of 55-74 years.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p=0.002 for rs12379183

Confidence Interval

95% CI: 1.04–2.72 for rs4961501

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0021731

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication