The societal benefits of reducing six behavioural risk factors: an economic modelling study from Australia
2011

Economic Benefits of Reducing Behavioral Risk Factors in Australia

Sample size: 20937986 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Cadilhac Dominique A, Magnus Anne, Sheppard Lauren, Cumming Toby B, Pearce Dora C, Carter Rob

Primary Institution: Deakin Health Economics, Deakin University

Hypothesis

What are the potential health and economic benefits of reducing six key behavioral risk factors in Australia?

Conclusion

Reducing common behavioral risk factors may provide substantial benefits to society, including significant cost savings in health care and increased productivity.

Supporting Evidence

  • Reducing risk factors could save AUD2,334 million over the lifetime of the 2008 Australian adult population.
  • There would be 95,000 fewer Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) if risk factors were reduced.
  • Achieving feasible reductions could prevent 161,000 new cases of disease and 6,000 deaths.
  • 5 million days of workforce absenteeism could be avoided.
  • 529,000 additional days of leisure time could be gained.

Takeaway

If people in Australia could reduce risky behaviors like smoking and drinking, it would save a lot of money and help everyone be healthier and happier.

Methodology

Simulation models were developed for the 2008 Australian population to estimate health and economic benefits from reducing six behavioral risk factors.

Potential Biases

Self-reported data may lead to inaccuracies due to exaggeration or misunderstanding of questions.

Limitations

The study relied on cross-sectional, self-reported data, which may underestimate the true impact of risk factors on productivity.

Participant Demographics

The study focused on the 2008 Australian adult population, approximately 20.9 million people.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.05

Confidence Interval

95% Uncertainty Interval AUD1,395 to AUD3,347

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2458-11-483

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication