Differences in fruit and vegetable intake and determinants of intakes between children of Dutch origin and non-Western ethnic minority children in the Netherlands – a cross sectional study
2006

Fruit and Vegetable Intake in Dutch and Non-Western Children

Sample size: 531 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Saskia J te Velde, Marianne Wind, Frank J van Lenthe, Knut-Inge Klepp, Johannes Brug

Primary Institution: Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam

Hypothesis

The study aims to determine differences in usual fruit and vegetable intake between native Dutch and non-Western ethnic minority children and to study the mediating effects of psychosocial and environmental determinants.

Conclusion

Ethnic minority girls in the Netherlands appear to have more favorable fruit intakes than Dutch girls, and ethnic minority children in general show more positive prerequisites for fruit and vegetable consumption.

Supporting Evidence

  • Ethnic minority girls ate fruit more frequently than Dutch girls.
  • Dutch children reported lower scores on determinants of fruit and vegetable intake compared to ethnic minority children.
  • Knowledge of recommendations and parental facilitation mediated the association between ethnicity and fruit consumption.

Takeaway

This study found that girls from ethnic minority backgrounds eat more fruit than Dutch girls, and that their parents help them eat healthier.

Methodology

Data was collected through self-administered questionnaires completed by 10-11 year-old children in primary schools in Rotterdam, measuring fruit and vegetable consumption and potential determinants.

Potential Biases

Potential bias may arise from self-reported data and the exclusion of Western immigrant children.

Limitations

The study is cross-sectional, limiting the ability to infer causation, and the sample is drawn from only one city in the Netherlands.

Participant Demographics

Children aged 10-11 years, with 51.4% from non-Western immigrant backgrounds.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.05

Confidence Interval

[0.002–0.50]

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1479-5868-3-31

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication