Evidence for handheld electronic medical records in improving care: a systematic review
2006

Improving Care with Handheld Electronic Medical Records

Sample size: 152 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Robert C. Wu, Sharon E. Straus

Primary Institution: University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Hypothesis

Do handheld electronic medical records improve physician performance and patient care?

Conclusion

Handheld electronic medical records may improve documentation, but more studies are needed to confirm their benefits.

Supporting Evidence

  • Two studies showed that handheld electronic medical records improved documentation.
  • One study found that documentation time was longer with handheld records.
  • Another study noted an increase in incorrect diagnoses with handheld records.

Takeaway

Using handheld computers to keep medical records might help doctors write down more information about their patients, but we need to study it more.

Methodology

A systematic review of randomized controlled trials comparing handheld electronic medical records to paper records.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to the small number of studies and specific patient population.

Limitations

The studies were limited to orthopedic patients and did not assess clinical outcomes.

Participant Demographics

Patients included postoperative orthopedic patients and practitioners involved in their care.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.00

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1472-6947-6-26

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication