Financial Evaluation of Vaccination Strategies for Bluetongue Virus Control in the Netherlands
Author Information
Author(s): Annet G. J. Velthuis, Monique C. M. Mourits, Helmut W. Saatkamp, Aline A. de Koeijer, Armin R. W. Elbers
Primary Institution: Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
Hypothesis
This study aimed to rank eight vaccination strategies based on their efficiency for controlling the bluetongue virus serotype 8 epidemic in 2008.
Conclusion
The study demonstrates that a financial analysis differentiates between vaccination strategies and indicates important decision rules based on efficiency.
Supporting Evidence
- Vaccination strategies were ranked based on their benefit-cost ratios.
- Strategies F and C were identified as the most efficient based on economic criteria.
- The study included a comprehensive financial analysis of the vaccination strategies.
Takeaway
The study looked at different ways to vaccinate animals to stop a disease called bluetongue, and found that some methods are better and cheaper than others.
Methodology
An economic model was developed to evaluate the efficiency of eight vaccination strategies based on costs and benefits.
Potential Biases
Potential biases in the assumptions regarding the effectiveness of vaccination and the epidemiological data used.
Limitations
The study's assumptions about infection rates and the impact of vaccination may lead to overestimations of benefits.
Participant Demographics
The study included the Dutch professional cattle, sheep, and goat sectors, as well as hobby farms.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website