Comparing Drug Eluting and Bare Metal Stents in Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Patients
Author Information
Author(s): Stettler Christoph, Allemann Sabin, Wandel Simon, Kastrati Adnan, Morice Marie Claude, Schömig Albert, Pfisterer Matthias E, Stone Gregg W, Leon Martin B, de Lezo José Suárez, Goy Jean-Jacques, Park Seung-Jung, Sabaté Manel, Suttorp Maarten J, Kelbaek Henning, Spaulding Christian, Menichelli Maurizio, Vermeersch Paul, Dirksen Maurits T, Cervinka Pavel, Carlo Marco De, Erglis Andrejs, Chechi Tania, Ortolani Paolo, Schalij Martin J, Diem Peter, Meier Bernhard, Windecker Stephan, Jüni Peter
Primary Institution: Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern
Hypothesis
To compare the effectiveness and safety of three types of stents (sirolimus eluting, paclitaxel eluting, and bare metal) in people with and without diabetes mellitus.
Conclusion
In trials that specified a duration of dual antiplatelet therapy of six months or more after stent implantation, drug eluting stents seemed safe and effective in people both with and without diabetes.
Supporting Evidence
- Drug eluting stents were associated with a decrease in revascularisation rates compared with bare metal stents.
- Trials with dual antiplatelet therapy for less than six months showed increased mortality risks.
- Overall mortality rates were similar across stent types in trials with longer dual antiplatelet therapy.
Takeaway
This study looked at different types of heart stents and found that using drug eluting stents is safe and helps people with diabetes and without diabetes when they take their medicine for long enough.
Methodology
Collaborative network meta-analysis of 35 trials comparing stents in patients with and without diabetes.
Potential Biases
Potential bias due to the variability in trial quality and follow-up durations.
Limitations
Some trials had short follow-up durations and varying quality in reporting dual antiplatelet therapy adherence.
Participant Demographics
3852 people with diabetes and 10,947 people without diabetes.
Statistical Information
P-Value
0.02
Confidence Interval
0.55 to 1.30
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website