Tea Consumption Enhances Endothelial-Dependent Vasodilation; a Meta-Analysis
2011

Tea Consumption and Endothelial Function

Sample size: 213 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Ras Rouyanne T., Zock Peter L., Draijer Richard

Primary Institution: Nutrition and Health Department, Unilever R&D Vlaardingen, Vlaardingen, The Netherlands

Hypothesis

Does tea consumption improve flow-mediated dilation (FMD) of the brachial artery?

Conclusion

Moderate consumption of tea substantially enhances endothelial-dependent vasodilation.

Supporting Evidence

  • Tea consumption is associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular disease.
  • Consumption of tea increased FMD by 2.6% compared to control.
  • The effect was observed in 8 out of 9 studies included in the meta-analysis.
  • Significant heterogeneity was found between studies, justifying the use of a random effects model.
  • Moderate tea consumption may provide a mechanistic explanation for reduced cardiovascular events.
  • FMD is a reliable measure of vascular reactivity and is inversely associated with cardiovascular events.
  • Quality of studies was assessed using a custom tool based on Delphi Consensus.
  • Publication bias was not indicated in the analysis.

Takeaway

Drinking tea can help your blood vessels work better, which is good for your heart.

Methodology

A meta-analysis of controlled human intervention studies was conducted to assess the effect of tea on flow-mediated dilation (FMD).

Potential Biases

Study quality scores were subjective and may have influenced the results.

Limitations

The reproducibility of FMD measurements is low, and the majority of studies measured FMD acutely.

Participant Demographics

Participants included healthy individuals and those with conditions like coronary artery disease and chronic kidney disease, with a mean age range of 30 to 62 years.

Statistical Information

P-Value

<0.001

Confidence Interval

95% CI: 1.8-3.3%

Statistical Significance

p<0.001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0016974

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication