Mid-term survival and complications of double-crown-retained removable dental prostheses placed in the dental practice – a retrospective study
2025

Mid-term survival of double-crown-retained dental prostheses

Sample size: 174 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Klotz Anna-Luisa, Hagspiel Stefanie, Büsch Christopher, Zenthöfer Stephanie, Rammelsberg Peter, Zenthöfer Andreas

Primary Institution: University of Heidelberg

Hypothesis

The survival probabilities of double-crown-retained removable dental prostheses (dcRDPs) would be lower than those reported in university studies.

Conclusion

Double-crown-retained prostheses fitted in a dental practice had acceptable mid-term survival rates and manageable complications.

Supporting Evidence

  • 39 (18%) of the dcRDPs failed during the observation period.
  • The probability of absence of prosthesis-related complications was 92% after 2 years and 80% after 5 years.
  • 141 dcRDPs (66.2%) faced at least one complication during the observation period.
  • Survival correlated with lower patient age and more abutment teeth.

Takeaway

This study looked at how well special dental prostheses last and how often they cause problems. They found that these prostheses work pretty well in regular dental practices.

Methodology

The study analyzed anonymized data from 174 patients fitted with 213 dcRDPs, evaluating survival and complications over a mean observation period of 3.9 years using Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses.

Potential Biases

The retrospective nature of the study may introduce selection bias, as data were collected from a single dental practice.

Limitations

The study is retrospective, and some data may be missing; also, the failure rate may be overestimated due to lost prostheses being classified as failures.

Participant Demographics

The mean age of participants was 68.6 years, with 43% male and 57% female.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.048 for age, p<0.001 for number of abutments

Confidence Interval

94% (90–97%) after 2 years; 86% (80–92%) after 5 years

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1007/s00784-024-06090-7

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication