Comparative Evaluation of Two Doses of IV Dexamethasone for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Lower Segment Cesarean Section Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial
2024

Comparing Two Doses of Dexamethasone for Pain Relief After Cesarean Section

Sample size: 70 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Muacevic Alexander, Adler John R, Vasan Nikitha, Kumar Meenakshi, Guria Sushil, Verma Krishika, Choudhary Renuka

Primary Institution: Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, Delhi, IND

Hypothesis

Does a 4 mg dose of IV dexamethasone provide comparable pain relief to an 8 mg dose in patients undergoing lower segment cesarean section under spinal anesthesia?

Conclusion

The 4 mg dose of dexamethasone is a better alternative for postoperative analgesia compared to the 8 mg dose, offering effective pain relief with fewer side effects.

Supporting Evidence

  • The 4 mg dose was associated with a lower mean VAS score compared to the 8 mg dose.
  • Both doses maintained VAS scores below 4 postoperatively for 24 hours.
  • Blood sugar levels were significantly higher in the 8 mg group at all time points measured.

Takeaway

This study found that giving 4 mg of dexamethasone after a cesarean section can help with pain just as much as giving 8 mg, but with less chance of raising blood sugar levels.

Methodology

This was a prospective, randomized, interventional comparative study involving 70 parturients assigned to receive either 8 mg or 4 mg of IV dexamethasone after cesarean section, with pain and side effects measured postoperatively.

Limitations

The study did not assess prolonged effects beyond 24 hours and lacked a placebo control group.

Participant Demographics

Pregnant women aged 18-40 years undergoing lower segment cesarean section under spinal anesthesia.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.05

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.7759/cureus.75020

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication