Patient Safety Climate: Variation in Perceptions by Infection Preventionists and Quality Directors
Author Information
Author(s): Shanelle Nelson, Patricia W. Stone, Sarah Jordan, Monika Pogorzelska, Helen Halpin, Megan Vanneman, Elaine Larson
Primary Institution: Columbia University School of Nursing
Hypothesis
Infection preventionists would perceive a lower climate of patient safety compared to quality directors.
Conclusion
Differences in perceptions exist between infection preventionists and quality directors, which could impact patient safety outcomes.
Supporting Evidence
- 149 hospitals responded to both surveys, representing a 46.3% response rate.
- Infection preventionists had a more positive perception of Senior Management Engagement than quality directors.
- An independent budget for infection prevention was a significant predictor of positive perceptions of safety climate.
Takeaway
This study looked at how two groups of hospital workers see safety in their jobs, and found they often see things differently.
Methodology
Analysis of two cross-sectional surveys conducted in California hospitals.
Potential Biases
Potential bias due to different survey methods for infection preventionists and quality directors.
Limitations
The study design was cross-sectional, limiting causal inferences, and results may not be generalizable outside California.
Participant Demographics
Participants included infection preventionists and quality directors from California hospitals.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p<0.01
Statistical Significance
p<0.01
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website