The Importance of the Neutrophil–Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) and the Platelet–Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) as Biomarkers for Differentiating Complicated and Uncomplicated Appendicitis
2024

Using Blood Ratios to Differentiate Appendicitis Types in Kids

Sample size: 282 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Anastasakis Michail, Trevlias Ioannis, Farmakis Konstantinos, Valioulis Ioannis, Kambouri Katerina

Primary Institution: 1st Department of Pediatric Surgery, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece

Hypothesis

Can the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) effectively differentiate between complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis in children?

Conclusion

The study found that NLR and PLR are significantly associated with acute perforated appendicitis, suggesting their potential as diagnostic tools.

Supporting Evidence

  • 27.5% of patients had complicated appendicitis.
  • NLR values > 7.92 had a sensitivity of 62.5% and specificity of 74.2%.
  • PLR values > 180.57 had a sensitivity of 61.1% and specificity of 68.9%.
  • The area under the curve for NLR was 0.736, indicating good diagnostic performance.
  • The study included children up to 16 years old who underwent appendectomy.

Takeaway

Doctors can use two blood tests to help tell if kids have a serious type of appendicitis or a milder one, which can help them decide on treatment.

Methodology

A retrospective review of medical records of 341 children with suspected acute appendicitis was conducted, analyzing NLR and PLR values.

Potential Biases

Potential biases may arise from the retrospective nature of the study and reliance on medical records.

Limitations

The study is retrospective and single-center, which may limit the generalizability of the findings.

Participant Demographics

The study included 282 pediatric patients, with a mean age of 10 years and 9 months, consisting of 62.2% males and 37.8% females.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.000

Confidence Interval

0.666 to 0.805

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.3390/diagnostics14242777

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication