Psychological Distress and Relational Intimacy following Sexual Violence: A Longitudinal Study
2024

Psychological Distress and Relationship Intimacy after Sexual Violence

Sample size: 274 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Stockman Dagmar, Uzieblo Katarzyna, Fomenko Elizaveta, Littleton Heather, Keygnaert Ines, Lemmens Gilbert, Verhofstadt Lesley

Primary Institution: Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

Hypothesis

The study aims to investigate the bidirectional association between psychological distress and emotional/sexual intimacy in sexual violence victims.

Conclusion

The study found that psychological distress negatively affects relationship intimacy, and higher intimacy levels can improve individual functioning in victims of sexual violence.

Supporting Evidence

  • Higher levels of psychological distress predicted lower emotional intimacy.
  • Higher emotional intimacy predicted lower levels of depression and anxiety.
  • Participants reported a history of child abuse, which was associated with higher psychological distress.
  • Emotional intimacy was found to be a strong predictor of psychological distress outcomes.

Takeaway

If someone feels sad or anxious after a bad experience, it can make it hard for them to connect with their partner, but feeling close to their partner can also help them feel better.

Methodology

The study used a three-wave yearly survey design to assess psychological distress and intimacy levels in a community sample of sexual violence victims.

Potential Biases

The sample may not represent all sexual violence victims, as it primarily included those with moderate levels of psychological distress.

Limitations

The study had a significant drop-out rate, which may affect the results, and it did not include the partner's perspective on intimacy.

Participant Demographics

The sample consisted of 89% women, 3% men, and 8% trans persons, with a mean age of 32 years.

Statistical Information

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.5334/pb.1240

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication