Validating the Development Model for Integrated Care
Author Information
Author(s): Minkman Mirella MN, Vermeulen Robbert P, Ahaus Kees TB, Huijsman Robbert
Primary Institution: Vilans, National Center of Excellence for Long-term care
Hypothesis
To what extent are the elements of the Development Model for Integrated Care relevant to and implemented in the integrated care practices for stroke, acute myocardial infarction, and dementia patients?
Conclusion
The Development Model for Integrated Care is relevant and can serve as a quality management tool across different integrated care settings.
Supporting Evidence
- All three integrated care settings rated the elements of the Development Model for Integrated Care as highly relevant.
- The average number of implemented elements was 50 ± 18 for stroke, 42 ± 13 for AMI, and 45 ± 22 for dementia.
- Integrated care coordinators found the DMIC helpful for assessing their integrated care development.
Takeaway
This study looked at how well a model for integrated care works in different health services, finding that it helps improve care for patients with strokes, heart attacks, and dementia.
Methodology
A survey was developed and distributed to integrated care coordinators in the Netherlands, assessing the relevance and implementation of 89 elements of the Development Model for Integrated Care.
Potential Biases
Responses were self-reported, which may introduce bias.
Limitations
The number of participants varied among patient groups, and responses were based on self-reported data.
Participant Demographics
Participants included integrated care coordinators from stroke, AMI, and dementia services in the Netherlands.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p<0.001
Statistical Significance
p<0.001
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website