The Comparative Efficacy of Burs Versus Piezoelectric Techniques in Third Molar Surgery: A Systematic Review Following the PRISMA Guidelines
2024

Comparing Burs and Piezoelectric Techniques for Wisdom Tooth Surgery

Sample size: 208 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Franco Rocco, Di Girolamo Mattia, Franceschini Carlo, Rastelli Sofia, Capogreco Mario, D’Amario Maurizio

Primary Institution: Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of L’Aquila, Italy

Hypothesis

Does piezoelectric surgery provide better outcomes than traditional bur techniques in third molar surgery?

Conclusion

Piezoelectric surgery results in less postoperative pain and swelling compared to traditional bur techniques, despite longer surgical times.

Supporting Evidence

  • Piezoelectric surgery resulted in significantly lower postoperative pain and swelling compared to traditional bur techniques.
  • The incidence of nerve injury was lower in the piezoelectric group, though not statistically significant.
  • Surgical time was longer with piezoelectric devices, but this was offset by improved healing outcomes.
  • Patients reported higher comfort levels during piezoelectric surgery compared to traditional methods.
  • Meta-analysis showed that piezoelectric surgery had a significant association with lower pain scores.

Takeaway

When dentists take out wisdom teeth, using a special tool called piezoelectric surgery can hurt less and cause less swelling than the old way with drills, even though it takes a bit longer.

Methodology

This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines and included randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, and comparative studies assessing third molar surgery using either burs or piezoelectric instruments.

Potential Biases

Low risk of bias was reported in the studies included.

Limitations

The studies included had mixed results, and the longer surgical duration of piezoelectric surgery may limit its use in routine cases.

Participant Demographics

The studies included a total of 208 subjects, with varying demographics across different studies.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.05

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.3390/medicina60122049

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication