Ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, radiography, and clinical assessment of inflammatory and destructive changes in fingers and toes of patients with psoriatic arthritis
2007

Ultrasound and MRI for Detecting Changes in Psoriatic Arthritis

Sample size: 25 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Charlotte Wiell, Marcin Szkudlarek, Maria Hasselquist, Jakob M Møller, Aage Vestergaard, Jesper Nørregaard, Lene Terslev, Mikkel Østergaard

Primary Institution: University of Copenhagen

Hypothesis

The study aims to assess the effectiveness of ultrasonography compared to MRI, x-ray, and clinical findings in detecting inflammatory and destructive changes in patients with psoriatic arthritis.

Conclusion

Ultrasound and MRI are more sensitive than x-ray and clinical examination for detecting changes in psoriatic arthritis, with ultrasound showing high interobserver agreement for bone changes.

Supporting Evidence

  • Ultrasound detected a higher frequency of changes in the distal interphalangeal joints of psoriatic arthritis patients compared to rheumatoid arthritis patients.
  • Bone changes were found exclusively in psoriatic arthritis distal interphalangeal joints.
  • Ultrasound and MRI showed major potential for improved examination of joints in psoriatic arthritis.

Takeaway

Doctors used special imaging tools to see how arthritis affects fingers and toes. They found that ultrasound and MRI are better at spotting problems than regular x-rays.

Methodology

The study involved 15 patients with psoriatic arthritis, 5 with rheumatoid arthritis, and 5 healthy controls, using ultrasound, MRI, x-ray, and clinical assessments to evaluate joint changes.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to the operator dependency of ultrasound and the small number of participants.

Limitations

The study's findings may not be generalizable due to the small sample size and the specific patient demographics.

Participant Demographics

The psoriatic arthritis group included 11 women and 4 men with a median age of 57 years.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/ar2327

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication