Musculoskeletal Injuries in Competitive CrossFit Athletes
2022

Musculoskeletal Injuries in Competitive CrossFit Athletes

Sample size: 333 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Purim Kátia Sheylla Malta, Zilli Adriana, Leite Gabriela Fernandes de Almeida, Susuki Gustavo Keiti, Hapner Lucas Maria S., Zangari Matheus Antonio C.

Primary Institution: Departamento de Medicina, Universidade Positivo, Curitiba, PR, Brasil

Hypothesis

What are the most frequent musculoskeletal injuries in CrossFit athletes who participated in a competition in 2017?

Conclusion

The percentage of athletes injured due to the practice of CrossFit was 44%, with a higher incidence among men, and the main type of injury was inflammation.

Supporting Evidence

  • 44% of athletes reported previous injuries, with 67.3% being men.
  • The main types of injuries were inflammations, sprains, and contusions.
  • The most affected anatomical sites were the shoulder, spine, and knee.
  • 75.8% of injured athletes were undergoing follow-up with healthcare professionals.
  • All athletes practiced CrossFit 5 times a week with an average training duration of 68.2 minutes.
  • 34.4% of injured athletes had a previous injury at the same site.

Takeaway

In a study of CrossFit athletes, 44 out of 100 got hurt, mostly men, and the most common injury was inflammation in the shoulder, spine, and knee.

Methodology

A cross-sectional study conducted through a questionnaire to adult competitors of both genders who participated in a competition in 2017.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to self-reported data and the reliance on participant understanding of injury.

Limitations

The study relied on a single competition and participant memory, which may affect the accuracy of the data.

Participant Demographics

The sample consisted of 333 athletes, with a mean age of 28.6 years, including 207 men and 126 women.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.002

Confidence Interval

95% CI

Statistical Significance

p=0.002

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1055/s-00042410

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication