Framework for Assessing Adverse Effects in Systematic Reviews
Author Information
Author(s): Loke Yoon K, Price Deirdre, Herxheimer Andrew
Primary Institution: University of East Anglia
Hypothesis
How can systematic reviews effectively incorporate the assessment of adverse effects?
Conclusion
A structured approach is necessary for systematically reviewing adverse effects to ensure balanced clinical decision-making.
Supporting Evidence
- Systematic reviews often focus only on treatment benefits, neglecting potential harms.
- A framework is needed to guide reviewers in assessing adverse effects.
- Strategic choices in the review process can influence the findings on harms.
Takeaway
When doctors look at how well a treatment works, they also need to check for any bad side effects to make sure it's safe.
Methodology
The framework was developed through consensus among experienced reviewers and experts in systematic review methodology.
Potential Biases
Potential biases may arise from the inclusion of observational studies and the varying quality of evidence.
Limitations
The study highlights the need for better methods in assessing adverse effects but does not empirically investigate the problematic areas identified.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website