A word of caution in the functional monitoring of patients after rectal cancer surgery: a multicentre observational study
2025

Monitoring Patients After Rectal Cancer Surgery

Sample size: 787 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Planellas P., Fernandes-Montes N., Golda T., Alonso-Gonçalves S., Elorza G., Gil J., Kreisler E., Abad-Camacho M. R., Cornejo L., Marinello F.

Primary Institution: Colorectal Surgery Unit, University Hospital of Girona, Department of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine University Hospital of Girona, University of Girona, Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain

Hypothesis

The study aims to evaluate the quality of functional follow-up and quality of life in patients with rectal cancer over two years following surgery.

Conclusion

There is a significant deficit in clinical follow-ups regarding the functional assessment of patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery.

Supporting Evidence

  • Two years post-surgery, gastrointestinal evaluation was performed in 86% of patients.
  • Only 46.4% of patients had their bowel movements recorded.
  • 28.2% of patients were diagnosed with fecal incontinence.
  • Only 0.8% of patients completed the Quality of Life questionnaire.

Takeaway

After surgery for rectal cancer, many patients don't get checked properly for problems like bowel or sexual issues, which can make their recovery harder.

Methodology

This multicentre, retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients undergoing rectal cancer surgery between January 2016 and January 2020 at six tertiary Spanish hospitals.

Potential Biases

The study may be affected by the Hawthorne effect, where the presence of researchers influences the behavior of healthcare providers.

Limitations

The study's retrospective and non-randomised design and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patient follow-up.

Participant Demographics

The study included 787 patients, with a median age of 67 years, comprising 67.9% men and 32.1% women.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1007/s10151-024-03089-w

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication