Racial categories in medical practice: How useful are they?
2007

Racial Categories in Medical Practice: How Useful Are They?

publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Lundy Braun, Anne Fausto-Sterling, Duana Fullwiley, Evelynn M. Hammonds, Alondra Nelson, William Quivers, Susan M. Reverby, Alexandra E. Shields

Primary Institution: Brown University

Hypothesis

Is it good medical practice for physicians to 'eyeball' a patient's race when assessing their medical status?

Conclusion

Relying on racial categories in medical practice can lead to serious medical errors and missed diagnoses.

Supporting Evidence

  • Racial profiling in medicine can lead to serious medical errors.
  • Historical definitions of race in medicine have been vague and inconsistent.
  • Self-identified race may not accurately reflect genetic differences.

Takeaway

Doctors shouldn't just look at a patient's race to decide how to treat them; it's better to ask about their family history and health needs.

Potential Biases

Using race as a proxy for genetic differences can lead to oversimplifications and misdiagnoses.

Limitations

The definitions of racial categories are historically and culturally specific, which complicates their use in medical practice.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pmed.0040271

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication