Association of Computed Tomography Scan-Assessed Body Composition with Immune and PI3K/AKT Pathway Proteins in Distinct Breast Cancer Tumor Components
2024

Body Composition and Breast Cancer: How CT Scans Relate to Immune and Signaling Pathways

Sample size: 52 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Cheng Ting-Yuan David, Fu Dongtao Ann, Falzarano Sara M., Zhang Runzhi, Datta Susmita, Zhang Weizhou, Omilian Angela R., Aduse-Poku Livingstone, Bian Jiang, Irianto Jerome, Asirvatham Jaya Ruth, Campbell-Thompson Martha, Sims-Mourtada Jennifer

Primary Institution: University of Florida

Hypothesis

This study aims to examine the extent to which computed tomography-assessed body composition phenotypes are associated with immune and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways in breast tumors.

Conclusion

Body composition can be associated with signaling pathways in distinct components of breast tumors, which may help inform tumor biology and therapy efficacies.

Supporting Evidence

  • Low muscle type was associated with higher expression of INPP4B.
  • High adiposity was associated with increased CD8 and CD45RO expression in stroma.
  • Low muscle was associated with lower pan-AKT expression in tumor.
  • High adiposity with low muscle was associated with lower expression of phospho-PRAS40.

Takeaway

Doctors looked at how body fat and muscle in breast cancer patients affect their tumors and immune systems. They found that different body types can change how tumors behave.

Methodology

Patients were classified into four body composition types based on CT scans, and protein levels in tumors were measured using a multiplex, spatially-resolved method.

Potential Biases

The timing of CT scans may have introduced reverse causality, affecting the associations observed.

Limitations

The study had a small sample size and potential biases due to the timing of CT scans relative to surgery.

Participant Demographics

Mean age was 56.8 years; 82.7% were White and 17.3% were Black.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.0003

Confidence Interval

95% CI = 0.79–6.19

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.3390/ijms252413428

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication