The Role of Inflammatory and Nutritional Indices in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: A Retrospective Study
2024

Inflammatory and Nutritional Indices in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

Sample size: 368 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Busra Demir Cendek, Burak Bayraktar, Mehmet Alican Sapmaz, Ayse Ecenaz Yıldırım, Mujde Can Ibanoglu, Yaprak Engin Ustun, Johannes Ott

Primary Institution: Health Sciences University Etlik Zubeyde Hanim Maternity, Teaching and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey

Hypothesis

This study aimed to evaluate the potential of inflammatory and nutritional markers in identifying decreased bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women.

Conclusion

The findings suggest that the GNRI could serve as a useful indicator for assessing bone health and the risk of osteoporosis.

Supporting Evidence

  • The GNRI was significantly lower in the osteoporosis group compared to the control group.
  • Magnesium levels were lower in the osteoporosis group than in the control and osteopenia groups.
  • The Na/Mg ratio was higher in the osteoporosis group compared to the control group.
  • The Ca/Mg ratio was lower in the osteoporosis group than in the control group.
  • The T-score was positively correlated with magnesium and Ca/Mg ratios.

Takeaway

This study found that certain nutritional scores can help identify women at risk for osteoporosis, and keeping magnesium levels balanced is important for bone health.

Methodology

This cross-sectional study retrospectively analyzed medical records of postmenopausal women from January 2018 to December 2023.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to the retrospective nature of the study and exclusion of certain health conditions.

Limitations

The study's data collection was limited to a single time point, and factors like alcohol and tobacco consumption were not recorded.

Participant Demographics

Postmenopausal women aged 55-61, with varying degrees of bone mineral density.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.013

Confidence Interval

95% CI: 0.597–0.752

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.3390/jcm13247741

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication