A cohort study of antihypertensive treatments and risk of renal cell cancer
2005

Antihypertensive Treatments and Renal Cell Cancer Risk

Sample size: 335682 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Fryzek J P, Poulsen A H, Johnsen S P, McLaughlin J K, Sørensen H T, Friis S

Primary Institution: International Epidemiology Institute

Hypothesis

Does the use of antihypertensive treatments increase the risk of renal cell carcinoma?

Conclusion

The study found that while users of antihypertensive treatments had a higher risk of renal cell cancer, this association is likely due to confounding factors rather than a direct causal relationship.

Supporting Evidence

  • Users of any antihypertensive treatment were 1.6 times more likely to have renal cell cancer compared to non-users.
  • Specific classes of antihypertensive treatments showed varying levels of association with renal cell cancer risk.
  • After 5 years of follow-up, the risk ratios for all classes of antihypertensive medications decreased.

Takeaway

People who take medicine for high blood pressure might seem to get kidney cancer more often, but it could be because they already had high blood pressure, not because the medicine causes cancer.

Methodology

The study analyzed data from 335,682 residents over 10 years, comparing those prescribed antihypertensive treatments to non-users and adjusting for confounding factors.

Potential Biases

Potential confounding from pre-existing hypertension and protopathic bias due to hypertension being an early sign of kidney disease.

Limitations

The study could not account for prior drug history before 1989 and lacked data on other known risk factors for renal cell cancer.

Participant Demographics

Participants were residents of North Jutland County, Denmark, aged 30 to 85, with a majority being women (58%) and over half over age 50 (77%).

Statistical Information

P-Value

1.6

Confidence Interval

95% CI 1.3–1.9

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1038/sj.bjc.6602490

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication