Rapid optical determination of salivary cortisol responses in individuals undergoing physiological and psychological stress
2024

Measuring Stress with Salivary Cortisol

Sample size: 22 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Ahmed Tashfia, Powner Michael B., Qassem Meha, Kyriacou Panayiotis A.

Primary Institution: City, University of London

Hypothesis

The study aims to determine salivary cortisol concentrations in healthy individuals undergoing the MAST protocol for stress activation using optical-colorimetric techniques.

Conclusion

The study successfully demonstrates a rapid and accurate method for measuring salivary cortisol levels, which could lead to the development of a point-of-care device for stress monitoring.

Supporting Evidence

  • The blue tetrazolium method showed a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.997 when compared to ELISA.
  • Salivary cortisol levels peaked approximately 20-30 minutes after stress elicitation.
  • The BT method is approximately 95% more cost-effective than the standard ELISA method.
  • Participants with higher depression scores showed lower cortisol concentrations post-stress.
  • The study highlights the potential for a point-of-care device for stress monitoring.

Takeaway

This study found a quick way to measure stress hormones in saliva, which can help people manage their stress better.

Methodology

Participants underwent the MAST protocol, and salivary cortisol was measured using the blue tetrazolium method and compared to ELISA.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to self-reported stress levels and the exclusion of participants with mental health issues.

Limitations

The study had a small sample size and excluded individuals with certain health conditions, which may limit the generalizability of the findings.

Participant Demographics

22 healthy adults, mean age 28.18 years, including 12 males and 10 females.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.0001

Statistical Significance

p<0.0001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1038/s41598-024-69466-5

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication