Global measure of satisfaction with psychosocial work conditions versus measures of specific aspects of psychosocial work conditions in explaining sickness absence
2008

Satisfaction with Work Conditions and Sickness Absence

Sample size: 13437 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Munch-Hansen Torsten, Wieclaw Joanna, Agerbo Esben, Westergaard-Nielsen Niels, Bonde Jens Peter

Primary Institution: Aarhus University Hospital

Hypothesis

Do specific aspects of psychosocial work conditions function as independent predictors of sickness absence beyond a one-dimensional global measure of satisfaction?

Conclusion

Low global satisfaction with psychosocial work conditions is associated with increased levels of sickness absence.

Supporting Evidence

  • Dissatisfaction with each of the six aspects of psychosocial work conditions was associated with an increase in sickness absence.
  • When all aspects were included in the model, only skill discretion and professionalism were negatively associated with sickness absence.
  • The global measure of satisfaction explained more of the negative association with sickness absence than any specific aspect.

Takeaway

If people are not happy with their work conditions, they tend to take more sick days. Just looking at specific parts of their work conditions doesn't help explain this.

Methodology

The study analyzed data from 13,437 employees using a questionnaire that assessed satisfaction with various aspects of psychosocial work conditions and their association with sickness absence.

Potential Biases

The study design may not account for individual characteristics that could influence both satisfaction and sickness absence.

Limitations

Important predicting variables such as physical demands and individual lifestyle were not included.

Participant Demographics

Employees from 698 public service workplaces in Aarhus County, Denmark.

Statistical Information

Confidence Interval

95% CI: -0.21 ; -0.02

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2458-8-270

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication