Conventional versus task-based package organization for out-of-hospital emergency kits: an emergency medical services simulation study
2024

Comparing Emergency Kit Organization Methods for Paramedics

Sample size: 80 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Laxar Daniel, Grassmann Daniel, Reischmann Lena, Kaider Alexandra, Schadler Bertram, Huber Carmen, Krammel Mario

Primary Institution: Medical University of Vienna

Hypothesis

Does task-based package organization improve equipment retrieval times in emergency medical services compared to traditional organization methods?

Conclusion

Task-based package organization did not significantly improve equipment retrieval times for paramedics in a simulated emergency setting.

Supporting Evidence

  • Participants frequently omitted items required for critical procedures, regardless of kit type.
  • Total time to completion was not significantly different between the two novel kits.
  • Seventy-five participants missed at least one item while preparing for endotracheal intubation.

Takeaway

This study looked at how paramedics use different ways to organize their emergency kits. It found that changing the way items are packed didn't help them work faster.

Methodology

Paramedics used four different emergency kits in a simulated setting to complete four tasks, with time to completion measured for each kit.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to participants not having prior experience with the emergency kits used in the study.

Limitations

The study used a simulated environment which may not fully reflect real-life scenarios, and participants were unfamiliar with the new kits.

Participant Demographics

Participants were predominantly male (98%) with a mean age of 36 years, and had a median of 9 years of experience in emergency medical services.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.11

Confidence Interval

73s (53–98s) vs 64s (48–99s)

Statistical Significance

p=0.11

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/s13049-024-01309-8

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication