A Literature Review of Cost-Benefit Analyses for the Treatment of Alcohol Dependence
2011

Cost-Benefit Analyses for Alcohol Dependence Treatment

Sample size: 94 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Svetlana Popova, Satya Mohapatra, Jayadeep Patra, Amy Duhig, Jürgen Rehm

Primary Institution: Centre for Addiction and Mental Health

Hypothesis

The study aims to evaluate the economic impact of pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy treatments for alcohol dependence through cost-benefit analyses.

Conclusion

Most treatment options for alcohol dependence yield significant economic benefits, with benefit-cost ratios ranging from 1.89 to 39.00.

Supporting Evidence

  • Psychotherapy treatments showed significant cost savings within the first six months.
  • Benefit-cost ratios for brief interventions ranged from 3.2 to 39.0.
  • Acamprosate treatment resulted in net savings of 528 € per patient over 24 months.

Takeaway

This study looks at how much money can be saved by treating people with alcohol problems, showing that many treatments save more money than they cost.

Methodology

A literature search was conducted across multiple databases to identify studies on cost-benefit analyses of alcohol dependence treatments, followed by data extraction from selected articles.

Potential Biases

Potential biases may arise from the limited number of studies and the reliance on existing literature, which may not comprehensively cover all treatment options.

Limitations

The study is limited by the small number of cost-benefit analyses available for pharmacotherapy treatments and the variability in how benefits were calculated across studies.

Participant Demographics

The studies included various populations, including newly abstinent alcoholics, couples, and older adults, with sample sizes ranging from 36 to over 600,000.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.0001

Statistical Significance

p<0.0001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.3390/ijerph8083351

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication