Parent-Targeted Oral Health Text Messaging for Underserved Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial
2025

Text Messaging for Children's Oral Health

Sample size: 754 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Borrelli Belinda PhD, Endrighi Romano PhD, Heeren Timothy PhD, Adams William G. MD, Gansky Stuart A. DrPH, Werntz Scott, Rueras Nicolle MA, Stephens Danielle BA, Ameli Niloufar MS, Henshaw Michelle M. DDS

Primary Institution: Boston University Henry M. Goldman School of Dental Medicine

Hypothesis

Can a bilingual, parent-targeted text messaging program improve oral health behaviors and decrease caries increment in a low-income and racially and ethnically diverse population of children?

Conclusion

The study found that while the text messaging intervention did not reduce caries increment, it significantly improved oral health behaviors among underserved children and their caregivers.

Supporting Evidence

  • Text messages improved child toothbrushing and preventive dental visits.
  • Caregivers in the intervention group brushed their teeth more often.
  • Children in the intervention group were more likely to use fluoride toothpaste.
  • High engagement rates with the text messaging program were reported.

Takeaway

This study showed that sending text messages to parents can help them and their kids take better care of their teeth, even if it didn't stop cavities from forming.

Methodology

The study was a randomized clinical trial comparing the effects of oral health text messages to child wellness text messages on caries increment and oral health behaviors over 24 months.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to self-reported data and the impact of COVID-19 on participant follow-up.

Limitations

Lower-than-expected attendance for oral health assessments due to COVID-19 and reliance on self-reported toothbrushing behaviors.

Participant Demographics

Participants included racially and ethnically diverse caregivers (94.6% female) and their children (50% female), with 68.3% living below the poverty line.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.99

Confidence Interval

95% CI, 0.63-1.56

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.52780

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication