Improving the Use of Research Evidence in Guideline Development
Author Information
Author(s): Andrew D Oxman, Holger J Schünemann, Atle Fretheim
Primary Institution: Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services
Hypothesis
How can health care recommendations be better informed by research evidence?
Conclusion
The study emphasizes the importance of using systematic reviews and rigorous processes to inform health care recommendations.
Supporting Evidence
- WHO has recognized the need for rigorous processes in health care recommendations.
- Existing systematic reviews should be critically appraised before commissioning new ones.
- Concise summaries of evidence should be presented to guideline committees.
Takeaway
This study is about making sure that health care guidelines are based on the best research available, so doctors can make better decisions.
Methodology
The authors reviewed existing literature and systematic reviews without conducting new systematic reviews themselves.
Potential Biases
Potential bias due to reliance on existing reviews and the subjective nature of appraising evidence.
Limitations
The study does not conduct new systematic reviews and relies on existing literature, which may not cover all relevant evidence.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website