Hydrodilatation, corticosteroids and adhesive capsulitis: A randomized controlled trial
2008

Hydrodilatation and Corticosteroids for Shoulder Pain

Sample size: 76 publication Evidence: low

Author Information

Author(s): Tveitå Einar Kristian, Tariq Rana, Sesseng Sølve, Juel Niels Gunnar, Bautz-Holter Erik

Primary Institution: Ullevål University Hospital, Oslo, Norway

Hypothesis

Does hydrodilatation provide significant treatment benefits compared to corticosteroid injections alone for adhesive capsulitis?

Conclusion

The study found no significant treatment effects from hydrodilatation compared to corticosteroid injections alone.

Supporting Evidence

  • Both treatment groups showed significant improvement from baseline.
  • The mean difference in SPADI improvement was 3 points, but not statistically significant.
  • Patients in both groups reported similar outcomes in range of motion measures.

Takeaway

Doctors wanted to see if a special shoulder treatment called hydrodilatation helps more than just giving a shot of medicine. They found out it didn't really make a difference.

Methodology

A randomized trial comparing hydrodilatation with corticosteroid injection alone, with patients receiving three injections over six weeks.

Potential Biases

Patients were not blinded to their treatment, which could introduce bias in self-reported outcomes.

Limitations

The study had a waiting period before treatment, which may have affected results due to spontaneous recovery.

Participant Demographics

{"age":{"DIL_group":"52 (7)","INJ_group":"51 (6)"},"gender":{"female":{"DIL_group":"67%","INJ_group":"51%"}},"duration":{"DIL_group":"7 (4)","INJ_group":"7 (4)"}}

Statistical Information

Confidence Interval

-5 to 11

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2474-9-53

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication