Prognostic and Risk Factors in Patients with Locally Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Trunk and Extremities
2011

Prognostic Factors in Advanced Skin Cancer

Sample size: 55 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Vinicius de Lima Vazquez, Scapulatempo Cristovam, Perpetuo Natalia Martins, Mohamed Faheez, de Carvalho Teóclito Sachetto, de Oliveira Antônio Talvane Torres, Segalla José Getúlio Martins, Carvalho André Lopes

Primary Institution: Hospital de Câncer de Barretos

Hypothesis

This study aimed to identify prognostic factors related to lymph node metastasis and survival in patients with locally advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.

Conclusion

The study found that certain factors, such as intratumoral lymphocytic infiltrate and tumor grade, significantly impact survival in patients with advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.

Supporting Evidence

  • Intratumoral lymphocytic infiltrate was associated with lymph node metastasis.
  • Patients with T3 tumors had better cancer-specific survival than those with T4 tumors.
  • Podoplanin expression was a negative prognostic indicator.
  • Patients with no lymph node involvement had better survival outcomes.

Takeaway

Doctors studied 55 patients with a type of skin cancer to find out what factors might help predict how well they would do. They discovered that some signs in the tumors can tell if the cancer is likely to spread.

Methodology

A retrospective study analyzing clinical, pathological, and molecular factors in patients with T3 and T4 cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to the retrospective nature of the study and the specific patient population from two cancer institutions.

Limitations

The study was limited to patients with available tumor paraffin blocks and excluded those with previous cancers other than basal cell carcinoma.

Participant Demographics

Mean age of participants was 63 years, with a range from 30 to 91 years; 58.2% were male and 89.1% were Caucasian.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.046

Confidence Interval

95% CI not provided

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1155/2011/420796

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication