QIR and SQUIRE: continuum of reporting guidelines for scholarly reports in healthcare improvement
2008

Improving Quality and Safety in Healthcare

publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Thomson R G, Moss F M

Primary Institution: Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle Medical School

Hypothesis

How can we effectively improve the quality and safety of healthcare systems?

Conclusion

The study emphasizes the need for practical guidelines to enhance the reporting and dissemination of quality improvement initiatives in healthcare.

Supporting Evidence

  • Over 9% of patients admitted to hospital are harmed by error.
  • Quality improvement work seeks to test the application of research results in local contexts.
  • The QIR structure has been used for over 50 published quality improvement reports.

Takeaway

This study talks about how healthcare can be made better and safer for patients by sharing good ideas and practices.

Methodology

The authors revised the structure for quality improvement reports and set guidelines for publication to better reflect practical quality improvement work.

Potential Biases

There may be a bias in the publication of quality improvement reports due to the lack of academic involvement from project leaders.

Limitations

The original QIR structure may not fully support the complexity of quality improvement projects, and there is a risk of oversimplifying the reporting process.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1136/qshc.2008.029074

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication