Comparing Depression Scales in Diabetic Patients
Author Information
Author(s): Khamseh Mohammad E, Baradaran Hamid R, Javanbakht Anna, Mirghorbani Maryam, Yadollahi Zahra, Malek Mojtaba
Primary Institution: Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Hypothesis
The study aims to assess the efficacy and accuracy of the CES-D and PHQ-9 scales in screening for depression among patients with type 2 diabetes.
Conclusion
Both the PHQ-9 and CES-D are effective screening tools for depression, but a formal diagnostic process is necessary for accurate diagnosis.
Supporting Evidence
- 43.2% of patients were diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder based on clinical interviews.
- The PHQ-9 identified 47.6% of patients with MDD.
- The CES-D identified 61.62% of patients with MDD at a cut-off score of ≥ 16.
Takeaway
This study looked at how well two questionnaires can find depression in people with diabetes. Both tools work well, but doctors still need to do a proper check-up.
Methodology
Outpatients with type 2 diabetes completed the CES-D and PHQ-9 questionnaires, followed by a clinical interview for diagnosis.
Potential Biases
Potential bias due to the self-report nature of the questionnaires and the specific patient population.
Limitations
The study may not represent all diabetic patients as it was conducted in a specialized center.
Participant Demographics
The mean age was 56.1 years, with approximately 52% female participants.
Statistical Information
P-Value
0.02
Confidence Interval
95% CI = 1.5-1.7
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website