Survival in patients with intermediate or high grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: meta-analysis of randomized studies comparing third generation regimens with CHOP
2001

Survival in Patients with Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: A Comparison of Treatments

Sample size: 1982 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Messori A, Vaiani M, Trippoli S, Rigacci L, Jerkeman M, Longo G

Primary Institution: Drug Information Center Azienda Ospedaliera Careggi, Firenze, Italy

Hypothesis

Do third generation chemotherapy regimens improve survival compared to the standard CHOP regimen in patients with intermediate or high grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma?

Conclusion

Third generation chemotherapy regimens do not improve survival compared to CHOP in patients with intermediate or high grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Supporting Evidence

  • Third generation chemotherapy did not prolong survival compared to CHOP.
  • The relative death risk for third generation regimens vs. CHOP was 0.92.

Takeaway

Doctors wanted to see if a new type of cancer treatment helped people live longer than the old one, but it turns out it didn't make a difference.

Methodology

A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials published in English from 1970 to 1999, including 5 trials and patient-level information.

Limitations

The study only included trials published in English and may not represent all available data.

Participant Demographics

Patients with intermediate or high grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.23

Confidence Interval

95%CI: 0.80 to 1.06

Statistical Significance

p=0.23

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1054/bjoc.2000.1566

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication