A novel model based on clinical and computed tomography (CT) indices to predict the risk factors of postoperative major complications in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy
2024

Predicting Major Complications After Pancreatic Surgery

Sample size: 360 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Wang Jiaqi, Xu Kangjing, Zhou Changsheng, Wang Xinbo, Zuo Junbo, Zeng Chenghao, Zhou Pinwen, Gao Xuejin, Zhang Li, Wang Xinying

Primary Institution: Nanjing Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University

Hypothesis

This study aimed to construct and validate a model for predicting postoperative major complications in patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Conclusion

The model based on clinical and CT indices demonstrates good predictive performance and clinical benefit for major complications in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Supporting Evidence

  • Major complications occurred in 13.3% of patients after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
  • The nomogram identified high visceral adipose volume, high systemic inflammation response index, high triglyceride glucose-body mass index, low prognostic nutritional index, and CA199 ≥ 37 as independent risk factors for major complications.
  • The C-index of the model was 0.854, indicating excellent discrimination.
  • The calibration curve showed satisfactory concordance between predictions and actual observations.
  • The decision curve analysis indicated substantial clinical utility of the nomogram.

Takeaway

Doctors can use a special chart to help predict if patients will have big problems after surgery for pancreatic cancer, which can help them take better care of the patients.

Methodology

The study collected clinical data from 360 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy and used LASSO multivariate logistic regression analysis to construct a predictive model.

Potential Biases

Inherent bias due to the retrospective nature of the study.

Limitations

The study was retrospective and had a small sample size, which may introduce bias.

Participant Demographics

The cohort included 173 males (48.1%) and 187 females (51.9%) with a median age of 61.0 years.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.05

Confidence Interval

[0.800–0.907]

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.7717/peerj.18753

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication