“It's ok, we're not cousins by blood”: The cousin marriage controversy in historical perspective
2008

Cousin Marriage and Its Risks

publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Diane B. Paul, Hamish G. Spencer

Primary Institution: Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Hypothesis

Is the hostility to cousin marriage scientifically well-grounded?

Conclusion

The risks associated with first-cousin marriage are generally much smaller than commonly assumed.

Supporting Evidence

  • Cousin marriage is illegal in 31 US states due to perceived genetic risks.
  • The NSGC report found that the risks of congenital defects from cousin marriage are about 1.7%–2% above the background risk.
  • Many laws prohibiting cousin marriage were enacted in the US during the Civil War era.
  • The stigma surrounding cousin marriage in the West is not scientifically justified.

Takeaway

People often think that marrying a cousin is very risky, but it turns out the chances of having problems are not as high as many believe.

Methodology

The National Society of Genetic Counselors reviewed existing studies on risks to offspring from cousin marriages.

Potential Biases

The laws against cousin marriage may reflect societal prejudices rather than scientific evidence.

Limitations

The study's estimates of risk may not apply universally across different populations and environments.

Participant Demographics

The discussion includes references to populations in the US and Europe, particularly British Pakistanis.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pbio.0060320

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication