Age Rationing in Healthcare: A Fair Approach?
Author Information
Author(s): Brauer S
Primary Institution: University of Zurich
Hypothesis
Could age be a valid criterion for rationing healthcare resources?
Conclusion
The study suggests that age rationing can be a morally permissible strategy for addressing healthcare resource scarcity under certain conditions.
Supporting Evidence
- Daniels argues that age rationing can be justified if it leads to better overall outcomes for society.
- The study highlights the importance of fairness in healthcare distribution across different age groups.
- Daniels' approach avoids ageism by framing healthcare allocation as a personal decision over a lifespan.
Takeaway
This study looks at whether it's fair to use age as a reason to decide who gets healthcare. It finds that sometimes, it might be okay to do so.
Methodology
The paper analyzes Norman Daniels' arguments regarding age rationing and its implications for healthcare justice.
Potential Biases
Potential biases may arise from the philosophical assumptions underlying the prudential lifespan account.
Limitations
The study does not address specific empirical data or case studies to support the theoretical framework.
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website