The Influence of Media on Disease Perceptions
Author Information
Author(s): Meredith E. Young, Geoffrey R. Norman, Karin R. Humphreys
Primary Institution: McMaster University
Hypothesis
To what extent is public perception of infectious disease modulated by high levels of popular media coverage?
Conclusion
The study found that high media frequency diseases are perceived as more serious and having higher disease-like status than equally serious diseases that receive less media attention.
Supporting Evidence
- Participants rated high media frequency diseases as significantly more serious than low media frequency diseases.
- Ratings of disease seriousness were strongly correlated with the frequency of print media exposure.
- Medical students also rated high media frequency diseases as more serious, indicating the effect persists across different knowledge levels.
Takeaway
People think diseases that are talked about a lot in the news are worse than those that aren't, even if they're actually similar.
Methodology
Undergraduate psychology and medical students rated the severity, future prevalence, and disease status of frequently and infrequently reported diseases.
Potential Biases
The study may not account for individual differences in risk perception across different demographics.
Limitations
The study's participants were limited to young adults, which may not represent the general population.
Participant Demographics
Undergraduate psychology students and first-year medical students, ages approximately 17-29.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p<0.001
Statistical Significance
p<0.001
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website